7.2日Pinetwork最新公告翻译:需要每个pi先锋去参与盲评,确保以分散的方式发布高质量的项目。

%title缩略图
%title插图%num

Review projects for Hackathon

REVIEW ON BRAISTORM

@PiCoreTeam

Jul 2nd – 3:47am

Hey Pioneers, the Pi Hackathon has kicked off and we need your help! Newly proposed projects will need your blind reviews to be accepted into the Hackathon. Blind reviews will filter out noise and ensure that quality projects get published in a decentralized manner. Visit Brainstorm now and tap on the “Review” button to start contributing!

Hackathon 的回顾项目

麦穗风暴研究综述

@ PiCore Team

7 月 2 日凌晨 3 点 47 分

嗨,先锋们,派编程马拉松已经开始了,我们需要你们的帮助!新提出的项目需要你的盲评才能被 Hackathon 接受。盲评会过滤掉噪音,确保以分散的方式发布高质量的项目。现在访问头脑风暴,点击“审查”按钮开始贡献!

Welcome to Pi Brainstorm

This is a new prototype where Pioneers can propose Pi Apps ideas for the future Pi Blockchain, join projects and engage other Pioneers to join projects. KYC’ed Pioneers can donate Pi in support of a specific published project. The donated Pi will only be distributed if the projects come to fruition. The Brainstorm app will initially publish project proposals for ecosystem apps (Type 2), and later business apps (Type 1).

The purpose

The purpose of this app is to include all Pioneers in the ecosystem building for Pi. The app hopes to channel the creativity, collective wisdom, talents and support from our large community of more than 10 million engaged Pioneers into producing real applications, creating utilities and building the ecosystem, which are crucial to the success of Pi.

How does it work?

All Pioneers can submit a new project proposal. The submitted projects are not automatically published. First, Pi chat moderators curate proposals for quality and spam/duplication removals. Second, the Core Team will publish a small subset of well-articulated project proposals that contain both a good idea and an initial implementation plan with enough details to indicate alignment with the ecosystem goals and feasibility. Although Pioneers can submit good ideas without having to build it themselves, the priority goes to proposals where the creator also commits as one of builders for the project. Then, all Pioneers will be able to see all published project proposals, and upvote/downvote them as to whether the project should be built to achieve utilities and our ecosystem goals. KYC’ed Pioneers can support the project even further by donating Pi as an incentive to the builders. Talented and motivated Pioneers can apply to join specific projects to help bring them to fruition

Keep in mind that this is an early prototype that we release as beta, and expect changes to come as the community starts using it.

Types of app projects

There are two types of projects that Pioneers can submit app proposal for:

Type 1: Apps with a business model. These apps can earn Pi from the business transactions inside their apps, for example charges of Pi for facilitating a purchase for goods or services or direct sales in Pi to Pioneers. These apps make their own independent product, technology and business decisions, e.g. what features or functionalities to include in the app and how much to charge.

Type 2: Ecosystem apps. Ecosystem apps are apps that may not have a business model but are essential to the infrastructure of the Pi ecosystem. The purpose of such apps are to complete insufficiencies, facilitate growth of the ecosystem and benefit the common good of the network. These apps can be developed by Pioneers, will be under the support and direction of the Core Team, and may be running on Core Team’s server infrastructure. Developers of such projects are primarily supported by community donations. Example type 2 apps: an alternative wallet app, a KYC app, etc.

Pioneers can propose both type 1 and type 2 apps. Keep in mind that the Core Team will initially focus on reviewing and publishing ecosystem apps proposed by people who intend to build them. Also, as communicated previously, please avoid submitting apps that are not compliant with the law or Pi’s policies or apps not in line with our ecosystem goals, e.g. apps facilitate hoarding, gambling apps or casinos.

Project roles

Each project usually contain the following roles:

Admins: For ecosystem app proposals, admins can approve team members and edit the project description. For business apps, the role of admins is assumed by the leaders of the project.

Business: People who would like to contribute to the business side of the project, such as marketing, operations, communication, pioneer engagement and support, etc..

Developers: People who would like to contribute technical skills to building of the project, such as engineers, designers etc..

翻译如下;

欢迎来到头脑风暴

这是一个新的原型,先锋可以提出Pi应用程序的想法,为未来的Pi区块链,加入项目,并聘请其他先锋加入项目。KYC’ed 先锋可以捐赠 Pi 以支持特定已发布的项目。捐赠的 Pi 只有在项目取得成果时才会分发。头脑风暴应用程序将首先发布生态系统应用(类型 2)和以后业务应用(类型 1)的项目建议。

目的

此应用程序的目的是将所有先锋纳入 Pi 的生态系统构建中。该应用程序希望引导创造力,集体智慧,人才和支持,从我们超过1000万参与先锋大社区生产真正的应用程序,创造公用事业和建设生态系统,这是至关重要的Pi的成功。

它是如何工作的?

所有先锋都可以提交新的项目提案。提交的项目不会自动发布。首先,Pi 聊天版主策划质量和垃圾邮件/重复删除的建议。其次,核心小组将公布一小部分精心阐述的项目提案,其中既包含一个好主意,也包含一个初步实施计划,其中有足够的细节,表明与生态系统目标和可行性一致。虽然先锋可以提交好的想法,而不必自己建造它,但优先权还是提案,其中创建者也承诺作为该项目的建设者之一。然后,所有先锋将能够看到所有已公布的项目提案,并上下投票,以决定是否应建立该项目,以实现公用事业和我们的生态系统目标。KYC’ed 先锋可以通过捐赠 Pi 作为对建筑商的激励来进一步支持该项目。才华横溢和积极进取的先锋可以申请加入特定项目,以帮助他们取得成果

请记住,这是一个早期的原型,我们发布作为测试版,并期待随着社区开始使用它的变化。

应用项目类型

先锋可以提交以下两种类型的项目:

类型 1:具有商业模式的应用。这些应用程序可以从其应用内的业务交易中赚取 Pi,例如 Pi 为商品或服务购买提供便利的费用,或在 Pi 到先锋的直接销售中赚取 Pi 费用。这些应用会做出自己的独立产品、技术和业务决策,例如应用中要包含哪些功能或功能以及收费多少。

类型2:生态系统应用程序。生态系统应用可能没有商业模式,但对 Pi 生态系统的基础设施至关重要。此类应用程序的目的是完成低效问题,促进生态系统的增长,并造福于网络的共同利益。这些应用可以由先锋开发,将在核心团队的支持和指导下,并可能在核心团队的服务器基础结构上运行。此类项目的开发商主要得到社区捐款的支持。示例类型 2 应用程序:替代钱包应用程序、KYC 应用等。

先锋可以同时提出类型 1 和类型 2 应用程序。请记住,核心团队最初将专注于审查和发布打算构建这些应用的人提出的生态系统应用。此外,如前所述,请避免提交不符合法律或 Pi 政策或不符合我们的生态系统目标的应用,例如,应用程序可促进囤积、赌博应用或赌场。

项目角色

每个项目通常包含以下角色:

管理员:对于生态系统应用提案,管理员可以批准团队成员并编辑项目描述。对于业务应用,管理员的角色由项目负责人承担。

业务:希望为项目业务方面做出贡献的人,如营销、运营、沟通、先锋参与和支持等。.

开发人员:希望为项目建设贡献技术技能的人,如工程师、设计师等。

%title插图%num

点击你想评价的项目点赞或者踩一下即可,自己可以点开翻译看看是否喜欢!

%title插图%num

盲评

盲评是学位论文评审的一种制度,就是采用随机抽取的方式,将一部分研究生的学位论文集中送到校外,把研究生和其导师姓名都隐去,请有关专家对其进行评审。这样可以避免一些人为因素。

中文名

盲评

对象

准备进行学位论文答辩的研究生

方式

随机抽取

制度

学位论文评审

盲评办法

1.参加盲评的硕士研究生(含同等学力申请学位)按当年申请学位论文答辩人数的10%随机抽取,作为论文盲评对象,被抽查者名单由研究生部备案。

2.被抽查参加学位论文盲评者的论文答辩资格由研究生部审核,审核通过后方可办理答辩手续。

3.被抽出参加论文盲评者应在接到通知的七天内,按规定格式制作论文(隐去作者和导师姓名),一式三份,由所在系(部、所)研究生秘书在规定时间内报送研究生部。

4.每篇学位论文由3位专家评审,研究生部不接受被抽查研究生及其导师推荐评审专家,不公开评审专家名单。

盲评结果的反馈

1.盲评结果一般在论文提交一个月后产生,研究生部负责将评审意见和评审结果及时通知研究生和导师,并给出准予按期答辩或不能答辩的明确意见。

2.论文盲评实行“二票否决制”,即只要有2位评审专家认定论文未达水平,就不能按期答辩,需按评审意见进行补充或修改并再次通过盲评后方可答辩。被盲评为不合格学位论文修改期限,不超过一年,修改后的论文仍必须参加盲评,原则上由原评审人员重新评审。论文若再次被否决,则取消该论文作者学位申请资格。

3.凡被盲评为不合格学位论文的指导教师所带研究生的学位论文必须全部参加下一轮盲评,且费用自理,同时提高所在学科盲评比例。

4.研究生指导教师若累计有两次(不同届)学位论文盲评中出现不合格,则限制招生两年,若一届中有两人次被盲评为不合格学位论文,则取消其导师资格。

5.若一个二级学科点一届研究生中有两人次被盲评为不合格学位论文,则对该学科予以警告、整顿及减少招生计划。

You May Also Like

About the Author: 2020fa

发表评论

您的电子邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用*标注